Dutch lawyer short shrifts ‘preferential reality’ in lawsuit against Rutte,Gates,Bourla,a.o..mkv
click on youtube link below for subtitles
22m23s https://www.bitchute.com/video/uZusjZ4s0nCT/
(Interview with businessman and entrepreneur Jim Ferguson, Dutch lawyer Meike Terhorst and Dutch GP Berber Pieksma and retired judge Barend van Thiel.)
"If you reject this request, the same blood sticking to the defendants' hands will stick to yours. This case deserves a public debate at the highest instance: the courtroom. I wish you much wisdom."
With these words, Dutch lawyer Peter Stassen closed his particularly impressive plea and addressing the judge, during a remarkable preliminary hearing in the Leeuwarden District Court, on 9 July.
During the trial, Stassen had requested the court to hear witness statements from financial expert Catherine Austin Fitts, medical expert Mike Yeadon and Alexandra Latypova, a professional in healthcare business and entrepreneurship, among others, as requested by three clients, harmed by the Covid-19 experimental gene-therapeutic jabs.
This request was contested by, in total, eight lawyers, representing Bill Gates; the chief editors of Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf and Dutch TV-broadcaster NOS Albert Bourla, and a range of high-ranking Dutch officials and politicians, such as Mark Rutte, who were responsible for the handling of the corona crisis.
Stassen was supposed to present this case together with his colleague, Arno van Kessel. On the 11th of June, the day after having submitted documents to do with the initial proceedings, Van Kessel was arrested and taken away blindfolded by a team of semi-military police and is being kept in the Netherlands’ highest secured prison, far away from his family, at least for another three months. The actual charge is unknown – most likely because the State Prosecution is still trying to find a criminal act.
If Van Kessel’s arrest was meant to intimidate Stassen, it did the opposite. As if he felt he had nothing left to lose, Stassen did all but mince his words the horns and named the defendants crimes for what they are: biowarfare, genocide, mass murder, deceit and assault.
Although the team of lawyers for the defendants are esteemed within the judiciary, Stassen dwarfed their presentations singlehandedly. In addition, the defendants’ framing of the suggested witnesses as ‘conspiracy theorists’ and ‘unqualified’ had lost all its magic on an audience tired of five years of lies, abuse of trust, physical harm and excess deaths.
“None of the defendants’ lawyers have responded to the content of my plea. They foolishly repeat the official narrative – which is the prerequisite for being chosen as executors by the defendants. The Dutch State's lawyer even has the nerve to repeat “safe and effective” here again, while facts and data have long since overtaken the official narrative," Stassen concluded.
The judgement will follow in six weeks time, so the 20th of August, at the latest.
A production in cooperation with potkaars.nl
(Subtitles are automatically generated.)
The Wall